Difference between revisions of "LightPi"

From hms.sternhell.at
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
<span style="font-size:x-small;">*...based on interpolation of various internet sources.</span>
 
<span style="font-size:x-small;">*...based on interpolation of various internet sources.</span>
 +
 +
&nbsp;
  
 
As the LightPi platform ist still under active development, several features are not yet implemented:
 
As the LightPi platform ist still under active development, several features are not yet implemented:
Line 43: Line 45:
 
*On-site network service for data access (planned).
 
*On-site network service for data access (planned).
 
*Independence of a central server infrastructure (design guideline).
 
*Independence of a central server infrastructure (design guideline).
 +
 +
&nbsp;
  
 
== Current state ==
 
== Current state ==

Revision as of 00:47, 17 November 2016

Introduction

The Lightrouter

Up to now, the Lightrouter was our preferred workhorse for collecting and transmitting Lightmeter data. It's low-cost and low-power design allowed for continuous nightsky measurements, automatic data transmission and even - to some extent -  remote maintenance.

But, over time several issues surfaced: 

  • The hardware version 2 of the WR1043ND rendered our firmware image obsolete, leading to a more manual setup routine.
  • Future hardware versions will come with a locked firmware, preventing the use of OpenWRT (due to a new FCC rule).
  • In offline-scenarios (no NTP, and no GPS) the internal clock performed terrible, exhibiting nonlinear, irregular drifts.
  • The internal flash memory is not large enough to hold the entire setup, leading to the need of an overlay filesystem, creating a high dependency on the presence of the USB stick.
  • Due to ill-defined brown-out behaviour of the router, the filesystem of several USB sticks got corrupted, leaving the stations paralyzed.
  • Our central server died (summer 2016), leaving the reverse-SSH-tunnels dangling in mid-air, and thus preventing remote connections and data collection.
  • Power consumption with up to 18W is too much for solar powered off-grid stations.
  • Some gerneral reliability issues.


The LightPi

To combat all these shortcomings, the LightPi is under development. Based on a Raspberry Pi, extended by a realtime module, the LightPi will be easier to set up and to maintain, without increasing the price tag.

Some of it's main features are:

  • High and reliable hardware availability, good inter-generation compatibility.
  • Higher computing power and full debian-based operating system.
  • Lower power consumption (2-4W [Model 3 B], 0.5-1.2W [Model A+]). * 
  • 4 USB ports (Model B+ upwards), eliminating the USB hub.
  • SD-card instead of small onboard flash - no more overlay filesystems.
  • Highly accurate DS3231 RTC module (+/-3.5ppm).
  • Simple plug-and-play with any FAT32 formatted USB stick for data storage.
  • As inexpensive as the Lightrouter.

*...based on interpolation of various internet sources.

 

As the LightPi platform ist still under active development, several features are not yet implemented:

  • Remote shell access (partly implemented).
  • Data transmission/collection (planned).
  • NTP synchronsiation (planned).
  • GPS synchronisation (planned).
  • On-site network service for data access (planned).
  • Independence of a central server infrastructure (design guideline).

 

Current state

The LightPi project's current state is  developing / testing .

All the key networking capabilities have yet to be implemented, but the offline version is already up and running. First long-term reliability tests are currently in their starting phase.


Setup

Preparation

...


Configuration

...



--Nero2401 (talk) 00:43, 17 November 2016 (CET)